↓ Skip to main content

Diamond Radio Receiver: Nitrogen-Vacancy Centers as Fluorescent Transducers of Microwave Signals

Overview of attention for article published in Physical Review Applied, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 3,587)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
47 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
twitter
11 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
Title
Diamond Radio Receiver: Nitrogen-Vacancy Centers as Fluorescent Transducers of Microwave Signals
Published in
Physical Review Applied, December 2016
DOI 10.1103/physrevapplied.6.064008
Authors

Linbo Shao, Mian Zhang, Matthew Markham, Andrew M. Edmonds, Marko Lončar

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
France 2 2%
Unknown 78 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 26%
Researcher 21 26%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 4%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 10 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 46 56%
Engineering 11 13%
Materials Science 7 9%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Unspecified 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 11 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 428. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2021.
All research outputs
#67,954
of 25,663,438 outputs
Outputs from Physical Review Applied
#1
of 3,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,540
of 422,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Review Applied
#1
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,663,438 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,587 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,938 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.