↓ Skip to main content

Neutron Drip Line in the Ca Region from Bayesian Model Averaging

Overview of attention for article published in Physical Review Letters, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
20 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
116 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Neutron Drip Line in the Ca Region from Bayesian Model Averaging
Published in
Physical Review Letters, February 2019
DOI 10.1103/physrevlett.122.062502
Pubmed ID
Authors

Léo Neufcourt, Yuchen Cao, 曹宇晨, Witold Nazarewicz, Erik Olsen, Frederi Viens

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 26%
Researcher 10 22%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 12 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 26 57%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Chemistry 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 14 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,747,094
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Physical Review Letters
#5,455
of 41,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,596
of 464,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Review Letters
#133
of 612 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 41,727 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 464,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 612 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.