| Title |
Evidence for Nonlinear Isotope Shift in Yb+ Search for New Boson
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Physical Review Letters, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1103/physrevlett.125.123002 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ian Counts, Joonseok Hur, Diana P L Aude Craik, Honggi Jeon, Calvin Leung, Julian C Berengut, Amy Geddes, Akio Kawasaki, Wonho Jhe, Vladan Vuletić |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 10% |
| France | 2 | 7% |
| India | 2 | 7% |
| Spain | 2 | 7% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Greece | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 16 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 53% |
| Scientists | 12 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 89 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
| Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 23 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 58 | 65% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Psychology | 1 | 1% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 23 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 155. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2021.
All research outputs
#258,917
of 25,121,692 outputs
Outputs from Physical Review Letters
#489
of 37,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,880
of 410,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Review Letters
#10
of 508 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,121,692 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 37,991 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 410,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 508 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.