↓ Skip to main content

Experimental Demonstration of Self-Guided Quantum Tomography

Overview of attention for article published in Physical Review Letters, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
12 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
Title
Experimental Demonstration of Self-Guided Quantum Tomography
Published in
Physical Review Letters, July 2016
DOI 10.1103/physrevlett.117.040402
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert J. Chapman, Christopher Ferrie, Alberto Peruzzo, Chapman, Robert J, Ferrie, Christopher, Peruzzo, Alberto

Abstract

Traditional methods of quantum state characterization are impractical for systems of more than a few qubits due to exponentially expensive postprocessing and data storage and lack robustness against errors and noise. Here, we experimentally demonstrate self-guided quantum tomography performed on polarization photonic qubits. The quantum state is iteratively learned by optimizing a projection measurement without any data storage or postprocessing. We experimentally demonstrate robustness against statistical noise and measurement errors on single-qubit and entangled two-qubit states.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 72 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 6%
Researcher 2 3%
Student > Master 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Lecturer 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 59 82%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 11%
Physics and Astronomy 3 4%
Psychology 1 1%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Unknown 59 82%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 75. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2016.
All research outputs
#164,251
of 11,424,677 outputs
Outputs from Physical Review Letters
#591
of 21,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,409
of 264,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Review Letters
#36
of 407 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,424,677 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 407 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.