| Title |
Evidence of Antineutrinos from Distant Reactors Using Pure Water at SNO+
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Physical Review Letters, March 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1103/physrevlett.130.091801 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A. Allega, M. R. Anderson, S. Andringa, J. Antunes, M. Askins, D. J. Auty, A. Bacon, N. Barros, F. Barão, R. Bayes, E. W. Beier, T. S. Bezerra, A. Bialek, S. D. Biller, E. Blucher, E. Caden, E. J. Callaghan, S. Cheng, M. Chen, B. Cleveland, D. Cookman, J. Corning, M. A. Cox, R. Dehghani, J. Deloye, C. Deluce, M. M. Depatie, J. Dittmer, K. H. Dixon, F. Di Lodovico, E. Falk, N. Fatemighomi, R. Ford, K. Frankiewicz, A. Gaur, O. I. González-Reina, D. Gooding, C. Grant, J. Grove, A. L. Hallin, D. Hallman, W. J. Heintzelman, R. L. Helmer, J. Hu, R. Hunt-Stokes, S. M. A. Hussain, A. S. Inácio, C. J. Jillings, S. Kaluzienski, T. Kaptanoglu, P. Khaghani, H. Khan, J. R. Klein, L. L. Kormos, B. Krar, C. Kraus, C. B. Krauss, T. Kroupová, I. Lam, B. J. Land, I. Lawson, L. Lebanowski, J. Lee, C. Lefebvre, J. Lidgard, Y. H. Lin, V. Lozza, M. Luo, A. Maio, S. Manecki, J. Maneira, R. D. Martin, N. McCauley, A. B. McDonald, C. Mills, I. Morton-Blake, S. Naugle, L. J. Nolan, H. M. O’Keeffe, G. D. Orebi Gann, J. Page, W. Parker, J. Paton, S. J. M. Peeters, L. Pickard, P. Ravi, A. Reichold, S. Riccetto, R. Richardson, M. Rigan, J. Rose, R. Rosero, J. Rumleskie, I. Semenec, P. Skensved, M. Smiley, R. Svoboda, B. Tam, J. Tseng, E. Turner, S. Valder, C. J. Virtue, E. Vázquez-Jáuregui, J. Wang, M. Ward, J. R. Wilson, J. D. Wilson, A. Wright, J. P. Yanez, S. Yang, M. Yeh, S. Yu, Y. Zhang, K. Zuber, A. Zummo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 7% |
| France | 3 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 2% |
| Finland | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 34 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 40 | 67% |
| Scientists | 17 | 28% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 43% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 29% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 325. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2024.
All research outputs
#104,081
of 25,611,630 outputs
Outputs from Physical Review Letters
#142
of 40,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,785
of 423,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Review Letters
#3
of 498 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,611,630 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 40,372 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,976 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 498 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.