↓ Skip to main content

Kinetic Effects in Dynamic Wetting

Overview of attention for article published in Physical Review Letters, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
17 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
Kinetic Effects in Dynamic Wetting
Published in
Physical Review Letters, March 2017
DOI 10.1103/physrevlett.118.114502
Pubmed ID
Authors

James E. Sprittles

Abstract

The maximum speed at which a liquid can wet a solid is limited by the need to displace gas lubrication films in front of the moving contact line. The characteristic height of these films is often comparable to the mean free path in the gas so that hydrodynamic models do not adequately describe the flow physics. This Letter develops a model which incorporates kinetic effects in the gas, via the Boltzmann equation, and can predict experimentally observed increases in the maximum speed of wetting when (a) the liquid's viscosity is varied, (b) the ambient gas pressure is reduced, or

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Argentina 1 2%
Unknown 62 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 38%
Researcher 9 14%
Professor 7 11%
Student > Master 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 10 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 25 40%
Physics and Astronomy 13 21%
Materials Science 2 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 18 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 147. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2017.
All research outputs
#155,531
of 17,363,630 outputs
Outputs from Physical Review Letters
#328
of 31,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,212
of 365,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Review Letters
#14
of 578 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,363,630 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,238 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 578 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.