↓ Skip to main content

In situ Polarized Neutron Reflectometry: Epitaxial Thin-Film Growth of Fe on Cu(001) by dc Magnetron Sputtering

Overview of attention for article published in Physical Review Applied, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
In situ Polarized Neutron Reflectometry: Epitaxial Thin-Film Growth of Fe on Cu(001) by dc Magnetron Sputtering
Published in
Physical Review Applied, May 2017
DOI 10.1103/physrevapplied.7.054004
Authors

Wolfgang Kreuzpaintner, Birgit Wiedemann, Jochen Stahn, Jean-François Moulin, Sina Mayr, Thomas Mairoser, Andreas Schmehl, Alexander Herrnberger, Panagiotis Korelis, Martin Haese, Jingfan Ye, Matthias Pomm, Peter Böni, Jochen Mannhart

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 21%
Professor 3 16%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Other 3 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 8 42%
Materials Science 6 32%
Computer Science 1 5%
Chemistry 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2017.
All research outputs
#17,289,387
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Physical Review Applied
#1,611
of 3,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,344
of 325,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Review Applied
#37
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,539 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,039 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.