↓ Skip to main content

Measuring Interlayer Shear Stress in Bilayer Graphene

Overview of attention for article published in Physical Review Letters, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
206 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
189 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Measuring Interlayer Shear Stress in Bilayer Graphene
Published in
Physical Review Letters, July 2017
DOI 10.1103/physrevlett.119.036101
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guorui Wang, Zhaohe Dai, Yanlei Wang, PingHeng Tan, Luqi Liu, Zhiping Xu, Yueguang Wei, Rui Huang, Zhong Zhang

Abstract

Monolayer two-dimensional (2D) crystals exhibit a host of intriguing properties, but the most exciting applications may come from stacking them into multilayer structures. Interlayer and interfacial shear interactions could play a crucial role in the performance and reliability of these applications, but little is known about the key parameters controlling shear deformation across the layers and interfaces between 2D materials. Herein, we report the first measurement of the interlayer shear stress of bilayer graphene based on pressurized microscale bubble loading devices. We demonstrate continuous growth of an interlayer shear zone outside the bubble edge and extract an interlayer shear stress of 40 kPa based on a membrane analysis for bilayer graphene bubbles. Meanwhile, a much higher interfacial shear stress of 1.64 MPa was determined for monolayer graphene on a silicon oxide substrate. Our results not only provide insights into the interfacial shear responses of the thinnest structures possible, but also establish an experimental method for characterizing the fundamental interlayer shear properties of the emerging 2D materials for potential applications in multilayer systems.

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 189 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 29%
Researcher 25 13%
Student > Master 17 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Student > Bachelor 9 5%
Other 30 16%
Unknown 40 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 47 25%
Physics and Astronomy 40 21%
Materials Science 30 16%
Chemistry 9 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 2%
Other 9 5%
Unknown 51 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2017.
All research outputs
#783,788
of 26,558,784 outputs
Outputs from Physical Review Letters
#2,238
of 41,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,750
of 313,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Review Letters
#43
of 564 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,558,784 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 41,425 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 564 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.