↓ Skip to main content

Nonperturbative Analysis of the Electroweak Phase Transition in the Two Higgs Doublet Model

Overview of attention for article published in Physical Review Letters, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
13 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
4 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Nonperturbative Analysis of the Electroweak Phase Transition in the Two Higgs Doublet Model
Published in
Physical Review Letters, November 2018
DOI 10.1103/physrevlett.121.191802
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jens O. Andersen, Tyler Gorda, Andreas Helset, Lauri Niemi, Tuomas V. I. Tenkanen, Anders Tranberg, Aleksi Vuorinen, David J. Weir

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 42%
Student > Master 2 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 17%
Researcher 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 8 67%
Materials Science 1 8%
Unknown 3 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 119. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2019.
All research outputs
#317,822
of 23,910,532 outputs
Outputs from Physical Review Letters
#677
of 36,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,344
of 355,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Review Letters
#18
of 612 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,910,532 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,695 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 612 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.