The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||18||60%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||1||3%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||20||21%|
|Student > Master||11||11%|
|Student > Bachelor||4||4%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Physics and Astronomy||12||12%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 86. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2020.
All research outputs
of 24,525,534 outputs
Outputs from Physical Review Letters
of 37,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 356,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Review Letters
of 617 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,525,534 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 37,525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,567 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 617 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.